Reforming the 1983 Mental Health Act.

نویسنده

  • T Hope
چکیده

A "Scoping Study Committee" has been established to advise the government on reform of the 1983 Mental Health Act (MHA). This provides a valuable opportunity for addressing, among other issues, the problem of discrimination against those with mental disorder. People with mental disorder are discriminated against in two quite different ways. Consider Mr A and Mr B, both of whom have been seriously violent. Mr A is not mentally ill. He serves a prison sentence. He is still a danger to others, but having served his sentence he cannot be further detained. Mr B suffers from a mental disorder. He is placed in a secure psychiatric hospital. As long as he is thought to pose a risk to others he continues to be detained. Thus, of two people, both equally dangerous, the one who has a mental disorder can be locked in a secure institution indefinitely in order to protect others. The one who is not mentally disordered is free once he has served his sentence. Consider now Mr C and Mr D. Mr C is physically ill, but he is not suffering from a mental disorder. He is refusing beneficial treatment. Without treatment, he may come to serious harm. However, he has the capacity to refuse treatment. The legal situation is clear: an adult with legal capacity may refuse any (even life-saving) treatment. Mr D, on the other hand, is suffering from a mental disorder, but he retains the common law capacity to refuse treatment. Like Mr C, Mr D is refusing beneficial treatment for his mental disorder. Mr D's common law right to refuse treatment, however, may be overridden under the 1983 Mental Health Act. Under current law, the surgeon has to stand by while his or her patient, who has capacity to refuse treatment bleeds to death. The psychiatrist, on the other hand, can intervene, ignoring his patient's competent refusal , to prevent much lesser harm. Why this double standard? This is not simply a theoretical issue as is shown by the case of B v Croydon District Health Authority.' This case concerned a 24-year-old woman who had been admitted to psychiatric hospital with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, and who had a history of self-harm. She was detained under the 1983 Mental Health Act following her attempts to cut and hurt herself. In hospital she was prevented from carrying out such harmful behaviour, but her …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Implications of the Mental Health Act 1983 (Remedial) Order 2001.

Whereas: (a) sections 72(1) and 73(1) of the Mental Health Act 1983(1) have been declared(2) under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998(3) to be incompatible with a Convention right(4); (b) the time for bringing an appeal has expired and no appeal has been brought within that time; (c) the Secretary of State considers that there are compelling reasons for proceeding by way of a remedial order...

متن کامل

The Bournewood gap (as amended?).

Both the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 authorise the treatment and detention of the mentally ill. Their interface is often clear cut. After all, the 1983 Act formally sanctions and safeguards compulsion where it is necessary to protect patients or others. Individuals can only be detained for psychiatric, not physical, health purposes. And such detention can only take p...

متن کامل

PERSONAL VIEW Human Rights Act 1998 and mental health legislation: implications for the management of mentally ill patients

In the management of mentally ill patients, there is a tension between protecting the rights of individual patients and safeguarding public safety. The Human Rights Act 1998 emphasises on the former while two recent white papers focus on the latter. This article first examines the extent to which the Mental Health Act 1983 is consistent with the Human Rights Act. It argues that while the recent...

متن کامل

Comparison of the effectiveness of coupled communication imaging therapy (imago therapy) with acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on the mental health of couples

Purpose: Most couples face communication problems in their marital life. Disturbing relationships have devastating effects on their physical and social performance. Methodology: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of communication imaging therapy (IMG therapy) with acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on the mental health of couples. Method: The research method was semi-exp...

متن کامل

Faith, ethics and Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983

Section 63 of the Mental Health Act 1983 states that an approved clinician can provide medical treatment irrespective of whether or not a detained patient has capacity to refuse such treatment. Case law has established that a range of acts ancillary to the core mental disorder treatment are allowed under Section 63. This article analyses a unique court judgment involving a detained Jehovah's Wi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of medical ethics

دوره 25 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1999